Skip to content
Back to blog
custody3 Nov 2026

What the Ripple trust bank charter requires of a custodian

The OCC gave Ripple National Trust Bank final approval to hold RLUSD reserves and custody digital assets. Here is what the charter requires and what to ask any platform.

Kumari JayaResearch note 7 min read
Matte charcoal slab with two compartments, each holding a keyhole and a key, split by a thin orange line

The point

On 26 October 2026 the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the US federal regulator of national banks, gave final approval to Ripple National Trust Bank. The charter covers three jobs: holding the segregated reserves behind the RLUSD stablecoin, acting as collateral trustee for RLUSD holders, and fiduciary digital asset custody. A trust charter is a list of duties, and the same list works as a test for any platform that holds your crypto.

What did the OCC actually approve for Ripple?

The OCC approved a national trust bank, not a deposit-taking bank. Ripple's release of 26 October 2026 names three approved activities. The first is managing the segregated reserves supporting Ripple USD (RLUSD). The second is acting as collateral trustee of those reserves for the benefit of RLUSD holders. The third is providing fiduciary digital asset custody services.

The final approval follows a conditional approval in December 2025. Ripple's release says RLUSD will keep being issued by Standard Custody & Trust Company, its New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) regulated limited purpose trust company. The new bank adds federal supervision on top of the state supervision that already applied.

Two facts qualify the approval. Ripple's own text speaks of the bank "upon opening" and "as RNTB begins operations", so the custody service is approved but not yet running. The approval is also contested. Decrypt reports that the Independent Community Bankers of America sued the OCC in federal court in October 2026. Its argument is that the crypto charters avoid the capital requirements and FDIC insurance that bind traditional banks. A final approval is a regulator's decision, and a court can still hear challenges to it.

As of 26 October 2026, Ripple says RLUSD has a $2.5 billion market cap and that BNY is the primary reserve custodian. It adds that Ripple publishes monthly independent third-party attestations of circulating supply and reserve assets. Those are Ripple's statements, read from its own release.

What does a national trust bank have to do with other people's assets?

A trust bank holds assets for others, so the rules that matter are the ones about keeping those assets apart from its own. US federal rules for national banks acting in a fiduciary capacity sit in 12 CFR Part 9, and three sections of it describe the duties in plain terms.

Rule 9.13(b) requires a national bank to keep the assets of fiduciary accounts separate from the assets of the bank. It also requires the bank to keep each fiduciary account separate from the others, or to identify the investments as the property of a particular account.

Rule 9.13(a) places fiduciary assets in the joint custody or control of at least two fiduciary officers or employees, designated by the board of directors. No single person can move them alone.

Rule 9.8 covers records. A bank documents the opening and closing of each fiduciary account and keeps adequate records for all of them. It keeps those records for three years from the later of the account's termination or the end of any litigation. It holds them separate and distinct from the bank's other records.

Rule 9.9 covers audit. At least once a calendar year the bank arranges an audit of its significant fiduciary activities, run under a fiduciary audit committee, and notes the results in the board minutes. A continuous audit system, activity by activity, can replace the annual one.

Read together, the duties are four: hold the assets apart, require two people to touch them, keep records that stand on their own, and have someone check. None of them mentions the price of anything. The charter makes a promise about how assets are handled, and the price of what is handled stays exposed to the market.

What should a holder ask any platform, charter or not?

An Indian platform does not apply for an OCC charter, so the useful move is to translate the four duties into questions a holder can put to any custodian. The questions below follow the order of the duties.

Are customer assets held apart from the platform's own?

Ask whether customer balances sit in accounts that are distinct from the platform's operating money, and where that is written down. A published statement that user funds are separated from operational funds is the plain version of what 12 CFR 9.13(b) asks of a US trust bank.

How many people have to agree before assets move?

The joint control rule exists because one login should never be enough. Ask how many approvals a withdrawal from the custody layer needs, and whether the answer is a policy or a technical control. The cold wallet piece covers what offline storage does and does not protect against.

Can the holdings be checked without asking the platform?

A record only helps if someone outside can read it. Ask for a reserves statement that is current, not a quarterly PDF, and learn what it covers. The guide to reading a proof of reserves attestation walks through what each line proves. A second piece asks whether proof of reserves proves a basket is backed and covers its limits.

Who audits, and how often?

Rule 9.9 names an annual cycle with results in the board minutes. Ask a platform the same two things: who checks the custody activity, and at what interval. An audit that happens when someone remembers is a different thing from an audit on a schedule.

How does a reserves report turn into a number you can use?

A reserves statement is arithmetic once you have it. The figures below are hypothetical, chosen to show the method.

Take a ₹1 crore portfolio with a 3 percent crypto sleeve. That is ₹1,00,00,000 × 0.03 = ₹3,00,000 held on one platform.

Suppose the platform's statement shows 1,000 BTC held against customer balances of 1,040 BTC. Coverage is 1,000 ÷ 1,040 = 0.9615, or 96.2 percent. Your ₹3,00,000 position is then backed by ₹3,00,000 × 0.9615 = ₹2,88,462 of reserves, and the gap is ₹11,538.

The same statement showing 1,040 BTC against 1,040 BTC reads 100 percent, and the gap is zero. The arithmetic takes a minute, and it tells you whether the statement supports the word "backed" for your position. Ripple's RLUSD release describes reserves held as U.S. dollar deposits, U.S. government securities and other cash equivalents with monthly attestations, which is the kind of statement this arithmetic applies to.

A companion list, five questions to ask any Indian crypto platform before your first deposit, starts from the deposit decision rather than the custody layer.

What does Qatobit publish on custody?

Qatobit holds user assets in institutional custody and publishes live Proof of Reserves, available at any time rather than on a quarterly cycle. The platform's design separates user funds from operational funds, and the accounting is accessible whenever a user wants to verify it. Those statements answer the first and third questions above in the platform's own words.

A holder reading any platform's custody page can run the same four questions and compare what is written. The answers should be specific. "Secure" and "safe" carry no number and no mechanism.

Where does this charter leave a crypto holder in India?

The Ripple approval is news about stablecoin reserves and enterprise custody in the United States. It changes nothing about how an Indian platform holds assets today. What it does give a holder is a clean, public example of what regulators ask a custodian to write down: separation, joint control, records and audit.

My view: the charter is worth reading for its duties, not its headline. A federal approval says a regulator reviewed the plan and will supervise it. It leaves unanswered whether reserves are enough on any given day, and that question is answered by attestations and by whoever checks them. Hold every custodian, regulated or not, to the four duties, and read the statement it publishes.

The position sizing question sits next to this one. If a single custodian holds your whole crypto sleeve, a custody failure takes the whole sleeve with it, which is the point of concentration risk.

Frequently asked questions

What did the OCC approve for Ripple National Trust Bank?

The OCC granted final approval on 26 October 2026 for a national trust bank. It manages segregated reserves behind RLUSD, acts as collateral trustee for RLUSD holders, and provides fiduciary digital asset custody. Ripple says the bank has been approved and that it will begin operations once it opens.

Is Ripple National Trust Bank a deposit-taking bank?

The approved activities in Ripple's release are reserve management, collateral trustee services and fiduciary digital asset custody. Deposit-taking is not among them.

What does a US national trust bank have to keep separate?

Under 12 CFR 9.13(b), a national bank keeps the assets of fiduciary accounts separate from the bank's own assets. It also keeps each account separate from the others or identifies investments as the property of a particular account.

Does a bank charter protect the price of a crypto asset?

No. The duties in 12 CFR Part 9 govern how assets are held, recorded and audited. The market price of what is held still moves.

What can an Indian crypto holder ask a platform about custody?

Ask four things. Are customer assets held apart from the platform's own? How many people must approve a movement? Can holdings be checked in a current published statement? Who audits custody, and how often?

Crypto investments are subject to market risk. Not financial advice.

“A better allocation begins with a better explanation.”

Qatobit principle

Published construction. Fixed cadence. Versioned control.